What is the difference between Documentary Collection terms D/P and D/A?

In international trade, Documentary Collection is a commonly used method for facilitating payment between exporters and importers. It involves the exporter entrusting the collection of payment for goods supplied to their bank, who then sends the shipping documents to the importer's bank along with payment instructions.

One crucial aspect of Documentary Collection is the release of shipping documents, which allows the importer to obtain possession of the goods and clear them through customs. However, these documents are only released by the bank under two different scenarios: D/P (Delivery document against payment) or D/A (Delivery document against acceptance).

Under D/P, also known as Documents against Payment, the importer's bank will only release the required shipping documents after full payment has been made. This ensures that the seller maintains control over the goods and can be confident that they will receive payment before releasing them to the buyer.

On the other hand, under D/A or Documents against Acceptance, the exporter permits both documents and goods to be released to the buyer in exchange for a promise of payment at a future date. This means that while the buyer can obtain possession of the goods upon accepting the documents, they are obligated to make payment within an agreed-upon timeframe.

The choice between D/P and D/A depends on various factors such as trust between parties, creditworthiness of buyers, and business relationships. Exporters who have a strong relationship with their buyers may opt for D/A as it provides more flexibility in terms of payment timing. However, if there are concerns about buyer's creditworthiness or trust issues, exporters may prefer D/P to ensure prompt payment.

In conclusion, Documentary Collection with its two variants - D/P and D/A - offers exporters a secure way to collect payments while allowing importers to obtain possession of goods. The choice between these two options depends on various factors and should be carefully considered based on individual trade transactions.

Comments

Mitigating Risks in Transferring Banks under Letters of Credit

Introduction: When engaging in international trade, letters of credit (LCs) play a crucial role in ensuring secure and efficient transactions. However, the process of transferring the L/C can expose both the transferring bank and the parties involved to certain risks. Mishandling or errors during the transfer can lead to claims and defenses against the transferring bank. In this article, we will explore the potential risks associated with transferring banks under letters of credit and discuss effective strategies to mitigate these risks. Understanding the Risks: 1. Documentation Errors: Incorrect or incomplete documentation can result in discrepancies that may trigger claims against the transferring bank. These errors can include discrepancies in quantity, quality, pricing, or even incorrect shipping dates. 2. Non-compliance with Terms: Failure to comply with specific terms and conditions outlined in the LC can lead to disputes between parties involved. This could arise from non-compl

The Principle of Independence in Demand Guarantees

Demand guarantees are a common tool used in international trade to provide assurance to the beneficiary that they will receive payment for goods or services rendered. These guarantees are often issued by banks and serve as a form of security for the beneficiary in the event that the applicant fails to fulfill their obligations. One of the key principles governing demand guarantees is the principle of independence. This principle dictates that a demand guarantee is separate and independent from the underlying transaction between the applicant and the beneficiary. In other words, the issuer's obligation to pay under the guarantee is not contingent upon the performance or non-performance of the underlying contract. This principle is enshrined in international standards such as the ICC Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (URDG 758), which explicitly state that a demand guarantee is subject only to its terms, whether expressly stipulated in the guarantee itself or incorporated by refere

Protesting a bill due to non-payment in D/A collection

Protesting a bill due to non-payment in documentary collection can be a necessary step to mitigate the risk of non-payment by the Importer. Under the terms of documentary collection with delivery document against acceptance, there is always a possibility that the transaction may not work out as expected if the Importer fails to pay on the maturity date. In such cases, the Exporter's Bank, also known as the Remitting Bank, can instruct the Importer's Bank, or Collecting Bank, to protest the bill for non-payment or non-acceptance. However, it is important to note that the Collecting Bank is not obligated to follow these instructions. If the Collecting Bank decides to handle the protest instruction, they may issue a bill note. It is crucial to understand that the specifics of this note may vary depending on different jurisdictions. To note a bill, the Collecting Bank typically sends it to a public notary who will then re-present it to the Drawee (Importer) on the same day it was r

GLOBAL TRADE view

Search This Blog