What is the difference between a demand guarantee and a suretyship guarantee?

Demand guarantee and suretyship guarantee are two distinct categories of guarantees that serve different purposes and have different conditions.

A demand guarantee is a type of guarantee that is independent from the underlying relationship between the beneficiary and the applicant. In this case, the beneficiary does not need to prove that the applicant has breached the underlying relationship in order to receive payment. The issuer of the demand guarantee is obligated to pay upon presentation of the stipulated documents and compliance with the terms and conditions of the instrument, regardless of whether there has been actual performance or breach of the underlying relationship. This means that as long as all requirements are met, payment will be made without considering any other factors.

On the other hand, a suretyship guarantee, also known as an accessory guarantee, is an undertaking by the guarantor to pay sums due from the applicant as a debtor to the beneficiary as a creditor. Unlike a demand guarantee, a suretyship guarantee is a secondary obligation that arises only if the applicant has a legal liability to pay the beneficiary. In this case, if there is no legal liability on part of the applicant, then there is no obligation for payment by the guarantor. The guarantor's obligation is limited to being no greater than that of the applicant.

Understanding these distinctions between demand guarantees and suretyship guarantees is crucial for handling them properly. It helps ensure good practice in dealing with these types of guarantees and prevents any misunderstandings or misinterpretations. By knowing whether you are dealing with a demand guarantee or a suretyship guarantee, you can determine what conditions need to be met for payment and what liabilities exist for both parties involved.

In conclusion, demand guarantees are independent from underlying relationships and require compliance with stipulated terms for payment, while suretyship guarantees are secondary obligations that arise only if there is legal liability on part of the applicant. Knowing these differences allows for effective handling and management of these types of guarantees in various financial transactions.

Comments

Mitigating Risks in Transferring Banks under Letters of Credit

Introduction: When engaging in international trade, letters of credit (LCs) play a crucial role in ensuring secure and efficient transactions. However, the process of transferring the L/C can expose both the transferring bank and the parties involved to certain risks. Mishandling or errors during the transfer can lead to claims and defenses against the transferring bank. In this article, we will explore the potential risks associated with transferring banks under letters of credit and discuss effective strategies to mitigate these risks. Understanding the Risks: 1. Documentation Errors: Incorrect or incomplete documentation can result in discrepancies that may trigger claims against the transferring bank. These errors can include discrepancies in quantity, quality, pricing, or even incorrect shipping dates. 2. Non-compliance with Terms: Failure to comply with specific terms and conditions outlined in the LC can lead to disputes between parties involved. This could arise from non-compl

The Principle of Independence in Demand Guarantees

Demand guarantees are a common tool used in international trade to provide assurance to the beneficiary that they will receive payment for goods or services rendered. These guarantees are often issued by banks and serve as a form of security for the beneficiary in the event that the applicant fails to fulfill their obligations. One of the key principles governing demand guarantees is the principle of independence. This principle dictates that a demand guarantee is separate and independent from the underlying transaction between the applicant and the beneficiary. In other words, the issuer's obligation to pay under the guarantee is not contingent upon the performance or non-performance of the underlying contract. This principle is enshrined in international standards such as the ICC Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (URDG 758), which explicitly state that a demand guarantee is subject only to its terms, whether expressly stipulated in the guarantee itself or incorporated by refere

Protesting a bill due to non-payment in D/A collection

Protesting a bill due to non-payment in documentary collection can be a necessary step to mitigate the risk of non-payment by the Importer. Under the terms of documentary collection with delivery document against acceptance, there is always a possibility that the transaction may not work out as expected if the Importer fails to pay on the maturity date. In such cases, the Exporter's Bank, also known as the Remitting Bank, can instruct the Importer's Bank, or Collecting Bank, to protest the bill for non-payment or non-acceptance. However, it is important to note that the Collecting Bank is not obligated to follow these instructions. If the Collecting Bank decides to handle the protest instruction, they may issue a bill note. It is crucial to understand that the specifics of this note may vary depending on different jurisdictions. To note a bill, the Collecting Bank typically sends it to a public notary who will then re-present it to the Drawee (Importer) on the same day it was r

GLOBAL TRADE view

Search This Blog