SBLCs Risks to be considered by Applicant

SBLC is an independent undertaking, the issuer of the SBLC has its own obligation to pay the beneficiary on receipt of a document made by, or on behalf of the beneficiary, which comply with the terms and conditions of the SBLC. Standby letters of credit is “irrevocable” meaning that it cannot be changed or cancelled prior to its stated expiry date without the agreement of all parties. Applicant should consider the following when deciding to use SBLC.

Performance risk: The applicant should carefully review and understand the terms and conditions of the SBLC, including any performance requirements or conditions that must be met in order to draw on the SBLC. Failure to meet these requirements could result in loss of funds or other negative consequences.
Legal risk: The applicant should seek legal advice to ensure that they fully understand their rights and obligations under the SBLC, as well as any potential legal risks associated with it. This includes understanding applicable laws and regulations governing SBLCs in their jurisdiction.
Fraud risk: There is a risk of fraudulent activity associated with SBLCs, such as fake or counterfeit documents being presented by beneficiaries seeking to draw on the SBLC. The applicant should implement appropriate due diligence measures to mitigate this risk.
Political and country risk: If the applicant is involved in international trade or transactions, they should consider political and country risks associated with both their own country and the beneficiary's country. This includes factors such as political instability, economic sanctions, currency exchange rate fluctuations, and changes in import/export regulations.

It is important for the applicant to thoroughly assess these risks and consider whether they are willing and able to accept them before proceeding with an SBLC application. Seeking professional advice from financial and legal experts can help in making an informed decision.

Comments

Mitigating Risks in Transferring Banks under Letters of Credit

Introduction: When engaging in international trade, letters of credit (LCs) play a crucial role in ensuring secure and efficient transactions. However, the process of transferring the L/C can expose both the transferring bank and the parties involved to certain risks. Mishandling or errors during the transfer can lead to claims and defenses against the transferring bank. In this article, we will explore the potential risks associated with transferring banks under letters of credit and discuss effective strategies to mitigate these risks. Understanding the Risks: 1. Documentation Errors: Incorrect or incomplete documentation can result in discrepancies that may trigger claims against the transferring bank. These errors can include discrepancies in quantity, quality, pricing, or even incorrect shipping dates. 2. Non-compliance with Terms: Failure to comply with specific terms and conditions outlined in the LC can lead to disputes between parties involved. This could arise from non-compl

The Principle of Independence in Demand Guarantees

Demand guarantees are a common tool used in international trade to provide assurance to the beneficiary that they will receive payment for goods or services rendered. These guarantees are often issued by banks and serve as a form of security for the beneficiary in the event that the applicant fails to fulfill their obligations. One of the key principles governing demand guarantees is the principle of independence. This principle dictates that a demand guarantee is separate and independent from the underlying transaction between the applicant and the beneficiary. In other words, the issuer's obligation to pay under the guarantee is not contingent upon the performance or non-performance of the underlying contract. This principle is enshrined in international standards such as the ICC Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees (URDG 758), which explicitly state that a demand guarantee is subject only to its terms, whether expressly stipulated in the guarantee itself or incorporated by refere

Protesting a bill due to non-payment in D/A collection

Protesting a bill due to non-payment in documentary collection can be a necessary step to mitigate the risk of non-payment by the Importer. Under the terms of documentary collection with delivery document against acceptance, there is always a possibility that the transaction may not work out as expected if the Importer fails to pay on the maturity date. In such cases, the Exporter's Bank, also known as the Remitting Bank, can instruct the Importer's Bank, or Collecting Bank, to protest the bill for non-payment or non-acceptance. However, it is important to note that the Collecting Bank is not obligated to follow these instructions. If the Collecting Bank decides to handle the protest instruction, they may issue a bill note. It is crucial to understand that the specifics of this note may vary depending on different jurisdictions. To note a bill, the Collecting Bank typically sends it to a public notary who will then re-present it to the Drawee (Importer) on the same day it was r

GLOBAL TRADE view

Search This Blog